FAKE SCIENTIFIC REPORT – BLACK MAN’S DNA TRACED BACK MILLIONS OF YEARS AGO – RE: ADAM AND EVE
DNA – GENETICS AND GENES – ORIGIN OF THE RACES OF HUMANKIND – NOT AS A FAKE SUPPOSEDLY “SCIENTIFIC” REPORT INDICATED RE: A BLACK MAN’S DNA TRACED BACK 385 MILLION YEARS AGO – ALONG WITH REFERENCE TO “ADAM AND EVE”
Note Harold L Carter’s “Reply to Inquiry response of Facebook member”:
— Most or all of the 19th century and 20th century experts and writers on “race” tended to keep alive the concept of the “difference” … how Africans differed from other existing races … populationwise. Although differences are observable to all – experts and laymen – that still didn’t get to the root source of that difference. In the 21st century, it is not through ignorance of existing scientific facts that this conclusion is continued, but rather the difficulty of accepting or acknowledging the position of people described as being of African descengt in world and human biological and cultural history after 500 years of enslavement and justification for that slavery followed by additional years of strict segregation.
Can you imagine German, Russian, French, and English world history textbooks acknowledging that the “black race” was the “original human race” ?
The 19th century “European Romanticism” movement discussed by Bernal in some instances declaring the supremacy of the “white” … “Aryan” … “blond and blue-eyed race still reigns supreme despite archaeological, molecular biological, and genetic evidenced to the contrary.
In those textbooks … Africa as the “kindergarten” of the evolution of the human race … yes.
As the “cradle of humankind” and “cradle of civilization” “mothe of western civilization … no.
And particularly the actual and authentic cause of that “phenotypical” … “obsrvable” … racial difference: extreme Wurm II “climatic change” experienced by the black tropically near the equator-full melanin-ladened and born black African migrants to Eurasia (“Europe”)
… as a consequence of Darwinian “natural selection” … mutation and gene change
… is specifically “omitted” as part of any discussion of racial differentiation in human history!
See “human variation” Molnar – “The Wikipedia Encyclopedia article showing the global map of Eurasia provided some relevant geographical details as well as some other related explanations with regard to where populations lived. Also the recent post about “white Caucasian race” Eurocentrically talks about the “Caucasian race” but with what you already know now you can make up or fill in those gaps
substituting the stated “white Cro-Magnons” with what you know about the historical fact that they were “black African migrants whose fossil bones were found in the Cro-Magnon cave in France.
The decptions flows from Eurocentrists either directly or implied stating it as though “white Europeans” sprung up suddenly in France and moved over the rest of Europe during the Upper Paleolithic age of world and human history.
There was no “white gene” that made white folks white and separated them from black folks! white or “bleached” or “lighter-skinned Africans” and “darker-skinned Afridans” both have the same gene and melanin content
only in different lesser or greater frequencies or proportions
as provided by established biological and genetic explanations (chromosome ribbon, number or amount of genes and genetic frequency).