ANCIENT WRITERS CLASSIFICATION OF PEOPLE LIVING IN THE MEDITERRANEAN, NORTHERN AFRICA, CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN AFRICA AND INDIA – “DARK-SKINNED CAUCASIANS” -“BLUE-EYED, BLOND” CAUCASIANS – “LIGHT-SKINNED CAUCASIANS” – “DARK-SKINNED” CAUCASIAN MEDITERRANEANS – AND “DARK-SKINNED” AND “WOOLLY-HAIRED” AFRICANS

THE CLASSIFICATION OF ANCIENT EGYPTIANS AND AFRICAN PEOPLE BY ANCIENT WRITERS – AND DON’T SKIM OVER L STODDARD’S “THE RISING TIDE OF COLOR” AND THE SUPERIORITY OF THE WHITE “ARYAN” RACE OVER THE BROWN AND YELLOW RACES AND GOBINEAU’S “BLACKS ON THE BOTTOM” – “WHITES ON TOP” … CHECK THEM OUT !
“ANCIENT EUROCENTRIC AUTHORS “SELECTED THOSE LATER EGYPTIAN ERA SCULPTURED STATUTES AND CARVED HEAD PIECES OF “MULATTO-LOOKING DYNASTIC EGYPTIANS,” WHO MIGHT HAVE BEEN THE PRODUCT OF MIXED-RACIAL OF SEXUAL UNIONS OR MISCEGENATIONS AND MARRIAGES BETWEEN NORTHERN AFRICAN EGYPTIANS AND FOREIGN HITTITES, ASSYRIANS, BABYLONIANS, PERSIANS, OR, MUCH LATER, MACEDONIANS AND GREEKS
NOT RACIAL-MIXING WITH INDO-EUROPEANS “FROM THE NORTH” –
WHO DO NOT APPEAR IN HISTORY AS A PART OF “WESTERN CIVILIZATION” UNTIL THOUSANDS OF YEARS AFTER EGYPT HAD REACHED THE HEIGHT OF ITS EMPIRE DURING THE REIGN OF THE THE EIGHTEENTH DYNASTY PHARAOH THUTMOSE III, RAMESSES III AND AMENHOTEP III.
THOSE ACTUAL, ASELECTED REPRESENTATIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL STONE AND BAS RELIEF ARTIFACTS SHOWING HOW ANCIENT EGYPTIANS LOOKED, IN TWENTIETH CENTURY AMERICAN TERMINOLOGY WOULD BE DESCRIBED AS HAVING BEEN OF “MIXED-AFRICAN DESCENT, WITH HIGH YELLOW SKIN OR COMPLEXION,” OR AS “NEGRO-CAUCASIAN-ALMOST CAUCASOID, WITH AMULATTO CRANAL-FACIAL FEATURES” AND NEVER UTILIZED WHEN MORE “CAUCASIAN-LIKE” PICTORIAL REPRESENTATION OF “EGYPTIANS” AS “REPRESENTATIVE OF AALL EGYPTIANS” ARE AVAILABLE AND THOSER ARE PRESENTED IN MOST CONTEMPORARY WORLD HISTORY TEXTBOOKS INSTEAD OF THOSE WITH MORE “NEGROID-LOOKING” CRANIAL-FACIAL FEATURES !
THE ASSYRIANS – THE BABYLONIANS – THE SUMERIANS:
ACCORDING TO PROFESSOR JAMES WELLARD, THE LANDS TO THE NORTH AND TO THE SOUTH OF THE TIGRIS AND EUPHRATES RIVERS WERE TO THE NORTH, UPPER MESOPOTAMIA, THE TERRAIN OF ASSYRIA AND TO THE SOUTH, LOWER MESOPOTAMIA, THAT OF BABYLONIA.
PRIOR TO THE BABYLONIANS THE SUMERIANS LIVED IN SOUTHERN MESOPOTAMIA AND WITH REGARD TO THE SUMERIANS, PROFESSOR WELLARD INDICATED:
“BY THE END OF THE CENTURY … RAWLINSON’S THEORIES WERE VINDICATED, AND SO WAS HIS BRILLIANT INTUITIVE OBSERVATION THAT THE BABYLONIAN SCRIPT WAS BASED ON A STILL OLDER LANGUAGE WHICH HE CALLED VARIOUSLY SCYTHIC, TURANIAN, THE HAMITIC LANGUAGE OF BABYLONIA, PROTO-CHALDEAN, AND AKKADIA.
“IT IS AN ANCIENT AND MOST DIFFICULT LANGUAGE.
RAWLINSON’S WHICH HE (RAWLINSON) WAS INCLINED TO TRACE BACK TO THE UPLANDS OF CENTRAL AFRICA DISCOVERY OF THE SUMERIAN LANGUAGE AND “THE ORIGIN OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION”:
“HE WAS, OF COURSE, FLOUNDERING ABOUT IN A VERITABLE PHILOLOGICAL QUAGMIRE, FOR AT THIS DATE, 1887, THE VERY EXISTENCE OF THE SUMERIAN PEOPLE AND CIVILIZATION WAS UNKNOWN AND UNDREAMT OF. It was Rawlinson’s brilliant discovery of their language that, in time, led historians back to the most ancient culture in the world, back to THE LAND OFSUMER WHERE WESTERN CIVILIZATION ORIGINATED. [Wellard 1972: 81]
“WITH REGARD TO THE HITTITES, ASSYRIANS, AND BABYLONIANS,
Professor Wellard stated:
“The HITTITE CONQUERORS of the great cultural centre of the ancient world WERE A NOMADIC, HORSE-BREEDING TRIBE OF INDO-EUROPEAN STOCK, WHOSE CULTURE SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN SIMILAR TO THAT OF THE GERMAN, FRENCH, AND BRITISH TRIBES SO WELL DESCRIBED BY JULIUS CAESAR AND TACITUS.
THEY WERE A BELLICOSE PEOPLE, NEARLY ALWAYS ON THE MOVE (hence the importance of their horses), and Aled by WARRIOR-CHIEFTAINS WHO ONLY CALLED THEMSELVES “KINGS” AND ACTED LIKE TYRANTS AFTER THEY HAD BECOME QUASI-CIVLIZED. They showed little interest in the arts and sciences, leaving these matters, no doubt, to their priests, MUCH AS THE TRIBAL CHIEFTAINS OF ANCIENT BRITAIN LEFT THE BUSINESS OF LEARNING AND TEACHING TO THE DRUIDS AND ATHE BARONS OF THE MIDDLE AGES LEFT THEM TO THE CLERICS
HITTITES ACQUIRED THEIR CULTURE FROM THE BABYLOIANS:
BUT THE HITTITES, AS THEY ACQUIRED LAND AND POSSESSIONS IN THE COURSE OF THEIR RAIDS INTO THE MIDDLE EAST, ASSIMILATED ALSO THE INTELLECTUAL ASSETS OF THE NATIONS THEY CONQUERED – THE LAWS AND SYSTEMS OF WRITING OF THE BABYLONIANS, FOR INSTANCE. AS A RESULT, THESE INDO-EUROPEANS,
AS THEY BECAME CIVILIZED, MERGED INTO THE POLYGLOT, MULTI-NATIONAL, AND BASICALLY SEMITIC WORLD OF THE MIDDLE EAST, INTO WHICH THEY FINALLY DISAPPEARED,
ALONG WITH EVEN MORE OBSCURE PEOPLES LIKE THE HATTI, THE HURRIANS, THE PEOPLE OF AHHIJAVA, AND THE INHABITANTS OF THE LUKKA LANDS.
“The hittites were succeeded by the kassites as conquerors of babylon. this latter people supposedly came from the mountains of persia to the east of the tigris and they kept control of babylon for the next 600 years, the period of the second babylonian dynasty.

EUROCENTRIC DEFINITIONS OF THE PEOPLES OF SOUTHWEST ASIA, NORTHEAST AFRICA, AND THE MEDITERRANEAN:
INHABITANTS OF NORTHEAST AFRICA, ASIA MINOR, AND INDIA:
AFRICANS LIVING IN NORTHEAST AFRICA WERE REFERRED TO AS “WHITE EGYPTIANS, AS CAUCASIAN-NEGROID, AND AS DARK-SKINNED CAUCASIANS.
SOUTHWEST ASIA: THE EUROPEAN OR WHITE OR CAUCASIAN RACE
Therefore, “LIGHT-SKINNED CAUCASIANS” were considered by nineteenth century writers to be MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN OR WHITE OR CAUCASIAN RACE.
PEOPLE LIVING IN THE MEDITERRANEAN AREA WERE CALLED “DARK-SKINNED CAUCASIANS
MEDITERRANEAN “BROWN RACE” AND AFRICAN “BLACK RACE”:
“DARK-SKINNED CAUCASIANS” LIVING IN THE MEDITERRANEAN, HOWEVER, WHO WERE CONSIDERED ALMOST WHITE WERE CONSIDERED MEMBERS OF THE BROWN RACE AS OPPOSED TO MEMBERS OF THE BLACK RACE LIVING IN AFRICA, BY THOSE SAME NINETEENTH CENTURY WRITERS
CENTRAL AFRICA:
“AFRICANS LIVING SOUTH OF EGYPT were referred to as “NUBIANS” and “BLACK ETHIOPIANS,”and were said to have “THE “DARKEST” SKIN AND ”WOOLIEST’ HAIR” AND WERE REFERRED TO AS “NEGROES” OR “PURE NEGROES”.
THESE WERE 17TH 18TH, 19TH AND 20TH CENTURY RACIST THEORIES. WHAT ARE THEIR ORIGINS?
WHO ARE THE CURRENT 20TH CENTURY WRITERS WHO ARE PROMULGATOTRS OF THESE OUTMODED RACIST CLASSIFICATIONS, WHO ARE PROMOTING AND PUBLICIZING THESE RECENTLY REVIVED THESE SLAVERY ERA, 17TH, 18TH, AND 19TH CENTURY RACIST NOTIONS, SPECULATIONS, AND PROPAGANDA IN THE GUISE OF AND POSING AS SUPPORTERS OF THE “MULTIREGIONAL THEORY OF THE ORIGIN OF MODERN HUMANS ? WHO ARE THESE ADVOCATES OF A “SEPARATE” EVOLUTION OF AN “EUROPEAN,” “ASIAN,” AND “AFRICAN” RACES OF HUMANKIND ? CHECK OUT THE NAMES LISTED IN RECENT RESEARCH FINDINGS IN THE PUBLICATIONS OF 21ST CENTURY SCIENCE MAGAZINES !
THE FALSIFICATION OF HISTORY ABOUT AFRICA AND AFRICANS AND THE CREATION OF AN EUROCENTRIC MYTH ABOUT WHO WERE “MEDITERRANEAN,” “EGYPTIAN,” AND “AFRICAN” “RACES OF HUMANKIND” BY 20TH CENTURY EUROPEAN AND AMERICAN WRITERS THAT IS MUCH MORE SOPHISTICATED THAN ANY SO-CALLED AFROCENTRIC MYTH SUPPOSEDLY ATTRIBUTING “RACIAL SUPERIORITY” TO PEOPLE OF THE AFRICAN RACE – WITH REMNANTS OF THESE EARLIER RACIST CULTURAL TERMINOLOGY BEING QUOTED EVEN IN THE LATE 1990’S AND THE FIRST DECADE OF THE 21ST CENTURY THAT ARE PARAPHRASED, REPHRASED, AND DOWNPLAYED SO THAT THEY WON’T BE CONSIDERED RACIST BUT STILL REMAIN AS AN EUROPEAN AND EUROPEAN-AMERICAN “EUROCENTRIC MYTH” COUNTERPART OF THE “AFROCENTRIC MYTH” AND IN REALITY AMOUNT TO AND REMAIN REPRESENTATIVE OF A “NOT OUT OF EUROPE: HOW EUROCENTRISM BECAME AN EXCUSE TO TEACH MYTH AS HISTORY” !
HOW THE EARLIER EUROCENTRIST CLASSIFICATION OF THE MEDITERRANEAN AND AFRICAN “RACES OF HUMANKIND” OCCURED HISTORICALLY, is very aptly discussed by Professor J. C. De Graft-Johnson, who in J. C. De Graft-Johnson, M.A., B.Com., Ph.D, in African Glory: The Story Of Vanished Negro Civilizations (Black Classic Press: Baltimore, Maryland), 1986 [first published 1954], stated:
“A WHOLE SECTION OF SOUTH AFRICA=S WITWATERSRAND UNIVERSITY IS DEVOTED TO RESEARCHES INTO THE ORIGINS AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE NEGRO RACE. A NUMBER OF THEORIES DESCRIBED AS BEING AS >PLENTIFUL AS FLOWERS IN SPRING= HAVE MADE THEIR APPEARANCE. THE PREJUDICES INHERENT IN THESE THEORIES HAVE BEEN ENDORSED AND PRESENTED TO THE ENGLISH-SPEAKING WORLD IN GENERAL BY PROFESSOR M.D.W. JEFFREYS. PROFESSOR JEFFREYS’ VIEWS HAVE BEEN PUBLISHED IN THE SEPTEMBER 1951 ISSUE OF THE WEST AFRICAN REVIEW UNDER THE TITLE “THE NEGRO ENIGMA.”
“THE NEGRO IN AFRICA IS DIVIDED LINGUISTICALLY INTO TWO MAIN GROUPS. (1) THE SUDANIC SPEAKING NEGROES OF WEST AFRICA AND (2) THE BANTU SPEAKING NEGROES OF THE CONGO, EAST AND SOUTH AFRICA.
author=s note: it should be noted that at least professor jeffries says:
“ALL ARE OF ONE RACE AND ARE REMARKABLY UNIFORM IN APPEARANCE.the black belt, anthropologically speaking, is that area on the Earth=’ surface THAT COMPRISES THE “DARK-SKINNED” RACES. Excluding the american negroes who were brought there by europeans. THE BLACK BELT EXTENDS FROM AFRICA, VIA INDIA, TO MELANESIA AND AUSTRALIA. In this great arc the position of the negro is the enigma. At the two ends, or horns, are people who are negroes, but in the centre there are none. THE CENTRE IS OCCUPIED BY A DARK SKINNED RACE, THE HINDU, but he offers no difficulty. He belongs to the same race as the “EUROPEAN,” namely the “CAUCASIAN,”
[NOTE: IN THE 18TH CENTURY THE AMERICAN INDIAN WAS CLASSIFIED AS WHITE – NOW IN THE 20TH CENTURY, PROFESSOR JEFFRIES CLASSIFIES THE HINDU FROM INDIA AS WHITE]
WHICH IS DIVIDED INTO THE “LIGHT-SKINNED CAUCASIANS” – “THE INHABITANTS OF EUROPE” – AND “THE DARK-SKINNED CAUCASIANS,” – THE INHABITANTS OF NORTH AFRICA, ASIA MINOR, AND INDIA.” [DE GRAFT-JOHNSON 1954: 2]
PROFESSOR JEFFRIES CONTINUED:
“THE CAUCASIAN COMES FROM AN OLD HUMAN STOCK – A STOCK THAT IS TODAY CALLED MODERN MAN. …
PROFESSOR JEFFRIES COTINUES:
“THERE ARE NO NEGRO SKULLS OF ANY ANTIQUITY – THE OLDEST KNOWN IS ABOUT 6000 B.C”
[NOTE: JEFFRIES – 1951 – LEAKEY’S DISCOVERY 1959-1962, JOHANSON 1974, HOFMEYR SKULL RE-DATED, 2011 !]
EXTINCT HUMANS TATTERSAL/SCHWARTZ & BOOK OF LIFE
“Let us view the problem from another angle. THE CAUCASIAN COMES FROM AN OLD HUMAN STOCK—A STOCK THAT IS TODAY CALLED”MODERN MAN.” MODERN MANGOES BACK A LONG WAY IN TIME. THE SWANSCOMBE SKULL FOUND IN GREAT BRITAIN IS DATED 150,000 YEARS AND IS OUR STOCK, NOT NEGRO. THE SKELETAL REMAINS DUG
Also making this very illogical and unreasonable and conflicting obseration:
“THE TWO GRIMALDI SKULLS … ARE NOT NEGRO SKULLS … THEY MERELY SHOW SOME NEGRO FEATURES.” THE ENIGMA DEEPENS: ALL THE AEVIDENCE POINTS TO THE NEGRO BEING A COMPARATIVELY RECENT RACE AND THE OLD CAUCASIAN RACE IN A CONTINUOUS STRETCH FROM BRITAIN TO INDIA”
[ALTHOUGH AS DE GRAFT-JOHNSON POINTED OUT: “AND YET ON EITHER SIDE OF INDIA ARE NEGROES.” [DE GRAFT-JOH NSON 1954: 2-3]

PROFESSOR DE GRAFT-JOHNSON THEN STATED:

WE HAVE QUOTED ENOUGH OF PROFESSOR JEFFREYS TO INDICATE THAT HERE YOU HAVE THE FOUNDATIONS OF A HERRENVOLK THEORY WORSE THAN ANYTHING EVER PROPAGATED BY HITLER. YOU HAVE ALSO A THEORY, WHICH, CORRECTLY INTERPRETED, MAKES THE NEGRO A STRANGER, AN INTERLOPER, AND A NEWCOMER IN AFRICA.
EVEN AS EARLY AS 1954, PROFESSOR DE GRAFT-JOHNSON HAD STATED:
PROFESSOR JEFFREYS’ VIEWS, TAKEN IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE VIEWS OF DR. LOTHROP STODDARD, AN AMERICAN, SHOULD MAKE US THINK VERY SERIOUSLY INDEED. THIS IS WHAT DR. STODDARD HAS TO SAY ABOUT THE NEGRO:

“FROM THE FIRST GLANCE WE SEE THAT, IN THE NEGRO, WE ARE IN THE PRESENCE OF A BEING DIFFERING PROFOUNDLY NOT MERELY FROM THE WHITE MAN BUT ALSO FROM THOSE HUMAN TYPES WHICH WE DISCOVERD IN OUR SURVEYS OF THE BROWN AND YELL0W WORLDS.
“THE BLACK MAN IS, INDEED, SHARPLY DIFFERENTIATED FROM THE OTHER BRANCHES OF MANKIND.
“HIS OUTSTANDING QUALITY IS SUPERABUNDANT ANIMAL VITALITY. IN THIS HE EASILY SURPASSES ALL OTHER RACES. TO IT HE OWES HIS INTENSE EMOTIONALISM.
“TO IT, AGAIN, IS DUE HIS EXTREME FECUNDITY, THE NEGRO BEING THE QUICKEST OF BREEDERS.
“THIS ABOUNDING VITALITY SHOWS IN MANY OTHER WAYS, SUCH AS THE NEGRO’S ABILITY TO SURVIVE HARSH CONDITIONS OF SLAVERY UNDER WHICH OTHER RACES HAVE SOON SUCCUMBED.
“LAST, IN ETHNIC CROSSINGS, THE NEGRO STRIKINGLY DISPLAYS HIS PREPOTENCY, FOR BLACK BLOOD, ONCE ENTERING A HUMAN STOCK, SEEMS NEVER REALLY BRED OUT AGAIN. [FOOTNOTE: L. STODDARD, THE RISING TIDE OF COLOUR – RELATIONS IN THE WORLD AND IN THE UNITED STATES. [DE GRAFT-JOH NSON 1954: 3]

[AUTHOR’S NOTE: SEE THE “BELL CURVE” AND SIMILAR CITED REFERENCES, SUPPOSEDLY MORE WELL-DOCUMENTED, REFINED, AND UPDATED, AND QUOTING CONTEMPORARY STATISTICAL DATA AND SOURCES, THAT CAN BE COMPARED WITH THE ABOVE INDICATED “RACIAL CHARACTERISTICS “AND “RACIAL GROUP” – “PSYCHOLOGICAL” AND “RACIAL PERSONALITY” TRAITS, MADE BY PROFESSOR STODDARD, THAT ARE INCLUDED IN RICHARD J. HERRNSTEIN AND CHARLES MURRAY, THE BELL CURVE: INTELLIGENCE AND CLASS STRUCTURE IN AMERICAN LIFE (FREE PRESS PAPERBACKS: A DIVISION OF SIMON & SCHUSTER INC: NEW YORK), 1994, 1996.
ALSO SEE THE BELL CURVE DEBATE: HISTORY, DOCUMENTS, OPINIONS, EDITED BY RUSSELL JACOBY AND NAOMI GLAUBERMAN (TIMES BOOKS: RANDOM HOUSE: NEW YORK AND TORONTO), 1995].
WITH REGARD TO INDIA, ATHE DARK-SKINNED HINDU RACE, AND THEIR ANCESTORS OR PREDECESSORS,
AND THE INDO-ARYANS FROM THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN STEPPES, THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE NOTED.
IT WAS INDICATED THAT:
“THE “ARYAN RACE,” MYTH OF “RACIAL SUPREMECIST THEORY” HAS BEEN INDICATED TO HAVE BEEN “ONE OF THE MOST MOST INFAMOUS AND DISASTROUS ATTEMPTS TO TRACE THE RACIAL ANCESTRY OF EUROPE.”
FURTHER, AIT WAS BORN AS A MINOR ISSUE IN COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICS, DEVELOPED INTO A PSEUDO-DARWINIANB THEORY OF HISTORY AND ENDED BY ALMOST DESTROYING CIVILIZATION.”

ORIGINALLY, THE TERM “ARYAN” WAS APPLIED TO A LANGUAGE GROUP
ALSO KNOWN AS INDO-EUROPEAN.
IN THE 1780’S, SIR WILLIAM JONES, AN ENGLISH ORIENTALIST, CONCLUDED THAT ANCIENT INDIAN SANSKRIT WAS RELATED TO PERSIAN, GREEK, LATIN,CELTIC AND THE GERMANIC LANGUAGE.
DETAILED COMPARISONS OF VOCABULARIES AND GRAMMARS ENABLED HIM TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY ALL MUST HAVE BRANCHED OFF FROM A LOST “MOTHER TONGUE.”
E CALLED THE LANGUAGE “ARYAN” AFTER THE “ARYAS”
“ AN ANCIENT PEOPLE WHO HAD INVADED INDIA AND PERSIA.

BY THE MID-19TH CENTURY, LINGUISTS, INCLUDING THE BROTHERS GRIMM AND FRANZ BOPP IN GERMANY, DEVELOPED >ARYAN= STUDIES INTO AN IMPORTANT BRANCH OF INQUIRY,
SIFTING EVIDENCE FROM LINGUISTICS, FOLKLORE, RELIGIOUS TRADITIONS AND ARCHEOLOGY.
IT WAS BUT A SHORT, ILLOGICAL STEP FROM THE NOTION OF
A SINGLE “MOTHER TONGUE” TO THAT OF A SINGLE “ORIGINAL RACE” THAT CIVILIZED EUROPE.
“THE PERIOD’S ROMANTICISM FOSTERED THE CONJECTURE THAT AN ARYAN MIGRATION HAD HAPPENED LONG AGO, THOUGH NO ONE AGREED ON WHEN OR WHERE. Instead of asking about the reality of the aryan race, SCHOLARS CONCENTRATED ON DETERMINING THE ARYAN’S RACIAL CHARACTERISTICS AND LAND OF ORIGIN.
COUNT ARTHUR DE GOBINEAU, A FRENCH JOURNALIST, ORIENTALIST, DIPLOMAT AND HISTORIAN, IDENTIFIED HIMSELF WITH THE FRENCH NOBILITY, THOUGH IN FACT HE CAME FROM A PROSPEROUS BOURGEOIS FAMILY. APPALLED BY THE FRENCH REVOLUTION OF 1848 AND THE >DEMOCRATIZATION= OF FRENCH POLITICS, HE DEVELOPED AN ELITIST THEORY
THAT MANKIND WAS DIVIDED INTO THREE RACES,
DIFFERING IN DEGREES OF SUPERIORITY:
BLACK AT THE BOTTOM,
YELLOW IN THE MIDDLE
AND WHITE AT THE TOP.
IN HIS “ESSAYS ON THE INEQUALITY OF THE RACES,” PUBLISHED IN THE 1850S,
HE DEVELOPED HIS NOTION THAT WITHIN THE WHITE RACE,
THE ARYAN BRANCH WAS THE HIGHEST OF THE HIGH.

ARYANS ORIGINATED IN CENTRAL ASIA, HE BELIEVED,
WERE TALL, BLOND, ALERT, HONORABLE AND POWERFUL.
“GOBINEAU WROTE THAT HE WAS >SURE THAT EVERYTHING GREAT, NOBLE AND FRUITFUL THAT MAN HAS CREATED ON EARTH … ISSUES FROM A SINGLE ROOT, RESULTS FROM A SINGLE IDEA, AND BELONGS TO A SINGLE FAMILY – THE ARYAN RACE.
IN ENGLAND, MAX MULLER, A PROFESSOR OF COMPARATIVE PHILOGY AT OXFORD, WAS THE MOST ELOQUENT CHAMPION OF THE ARYAN SOURCE OF EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION.

… IN 1888, HE ABOUT-FACED, ARGUING THAT LANGUAGE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RACE AND THAT A PERSON OF ANY RACE CAN LEARN TO SPEAK ANY LANGUAGE.
AN ETHNOLOGIST WHO SPEAKS OF “ARYAN RACE,”
“ARYAN BLOOD,”
“ARYAN EYES” AND “HAIR,” HE WROTE, IS AS GREAT A SINNER AS A LINGUIST WHO SPEAKS OF A “DOLICHOCEPHALIC (LONG-HEADED)” – “DICTIONARY” OR A “BRACHYCEPHALIC (BROAD-HEADED)” – “GRAMMAR.”
BUT MULLER’S EARLIER TEACHINGS HAD BEEN ENORMOUSLY INFLUENTIAL.
WITH THE SPREAD OF EUROPEAN COLONIAL EMPIRES
AND THE INEQUALITIES OF ECONOMIC DOMINATION,
CAME THE RISE OF “SOCIAL DARWINISM” AS A CONVENIENT JUSTIFICATION FOR CONQUEST.
IF EVOLUTIONISTS HAD TAUGHT THAT IT IS “NATURAL SELECTION” FOR THE “FITTEST” TO SURVIVE,
THEN IT WAS ONLY RIGHT THAT THE “SUPERIOR” WHITE RACE
SHOULD DOMINATE AND SUBJUGATE
PEOPLE WITH YELLOW AND BROWN SKIN.
AND “BLOND, BLUE-EYED” PEOPLE
SHOULD RULE OVER “BROWN-EYED” PEOPLE,
“GERMANS” OVER “JEWS” AND SO ON.
[NOTE: “THE “FITTEST” OF WHICH RACE ! … AN ACCURATE WORLD AND HUMAN HISTORY SHOWS THAT IT WAS “THE ‘FITTEST’ OF THE “BLACK AFRICAN” RACE”
WHO SURVIVED AS “LIGHT-SKINNED AFRICANS” !
AN EVOLUTIONARY EVENT
THAT IS NEVER MENTIONED IN WORLD HISTORY AND ANTHROPOLOGY AND PALEOANTHROPOLOGY TEXTBOOKS – OR IF MENTIONED “GLOSSED OVER” OR “DE-EMPHASIZED” OMITTING AND NOT MAKING SPECIFIC MENTIONJ OF THE RACIAL IDENTITY OF THE AFRICAN MIGRANT PEOPLE AFFECTED BY THE THEN INTENSELY NORTHERN COLDER CLIMATE CAUSING THAT “MUTATION” AND “CHANGE OF SKIN COLOR THROUGH”NATURAL SELECTION” ! ]

CHAMBERLAIN WROTE THIS PROPHETIC STATEMENT IN HIS FOUNDATIONS:
“THOUGH IT WERE PROVED THAT THERE NEVER WAS AN ARYAN RACE IN THE PAST, YET WE DESIRE THAT IN THE FUTURE THERE MAY BE ONE. THAT IS THE DECISIVE STANDPOINT FOR MEN OF ACTION.”
WHEN ASKED TO DEFINE AN ARYAN DURING THE HEIGHT OF THE NAZI MADNESS, JOSEF GOEBBELS PROCLAIMED,
“I DECIDE WHO IS JEWISH AND WHO IS ARYAN” ! … WHEN HITLER NEEDED THE JAPANESE AS ALLIES IN WORLD WAR II, HE PROMPTLY REDEFINED THE ASIANS” AS ARABS.”

Advertisements

About Harold L Carter

Bachelor of Science, Columbia University Masters degree, Ohio State University Undergraduate National Officer, Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Eastern Asst Vice President, when a student at Columbia University Profile Photograph: Mom & Me, when I was a graduate student
This entry was posted in "ARYAN" RACE, "BROWN" RACE, "DARK-SKINNED" CAUCASIANS, "EUROCENTRISM" - "TEACHING MYTH AS HISTORY", "INDO-EUROPEAN" SPEAKING POPULATION - "INDO-EUROPEAN" RACE ?, "MEDITERRANEAN" RACE, Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s